Plant Cell as a Computational Unit: Signal Integration and Decision Making from Root to Flower

Authors

  • Markus Schneider Department of Plant Systems Biology, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco, México Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64229/3nd44q18

Keywords:

Plant Cell Computation, Signal Integration, Systems Biology, Plant Neurobiology (Analog), Long-Distance Signaling, Root Apex, Shoot Apical Meristem, Phenotypic Plasticity, Predictive Modelling

Abstract

The traditional view of plants as passive, reactive organisms has been fundamentally overturned. Modern plant science reveals a sophisticated entity capable of sensing, processing, and responding to a multitude of concurrent environmental and internal signals with remarkable precision. This article proposes and elaborates on a paradigm-shifting framework: conceptualizing the plant cell, and by extension, the plant as a whole, as a distributed biological computational system. We argue that plant cells function as fundamental processing nodes within a networked organism, executing complex operations of signal perception, integration, memory, and decision-making that govern development, growth, and survival. This review synthesizes evidence across scales-from molecular networks within single cells to long-distance communication between organs. We detail the cellular “hardware”: receptors as sensors, second messengers as signal transducers, and protein-phosphorylation/ gene-regulatory networks as logic gates. We then explore how specialized tissues, such as the root apex and shoot apical meristem, act as central processing hubs, integrating local and systemic data to direct exploratory growth (root) or developmental fate (shoot). A dedicated figure illustrates this plant-wide “computational network,” while a comprehensive table maps biological components to computational analogs. The article further examines how plants perform cost-benefit analyses and predictive modeling, for instance, in balancing root foraging against shoot growth under resource limitation. Finally, we discuss the implications of this computational perspective for predictive agriculture, such as designing crops with enhanced environmental decision-making logic or using in silico models to simulate plant responses. By adopting this lens, we not only deepen our understanding of plant intelligence but also unlock novel bio-inspired computational strategies and engineering approaches for building resilient agricultural systems.

References

[1]Trewavas, A. (2017). The foundations of plant intelligence. Interface Focus, 7(3), 20160098. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0098

[2]Whippo, C. W., & Hangarter, R. P. (2006). Phototropism: bending towards enlightenment. The Plant Cell, 18(5), 1110-1119. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.039669

[3]Monshausen, G. B., & Gilroy, S. (2009). Feeling green: mechanosensing in plants. Trends in Cell Biology, 19(5), 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.02.005

[4]Van Norman, J. M., et al. (2011). Intercellular communication during plant development. The Plant Cell, 23(3), 855-864. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.082982

[5]Bassel, G. W. (2018). Information processing and distributed computation in plant organs. Trends in Plant Science, 23(11), 994-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.006

[6]Forde, B. G., & Lorenzo, H. (2001). The nutritional control of root development. Plant and Soil, 232(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010329902165

[7]De Smet, I., et al. (2010). Bimodular auxin response controls organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2705-2710. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915001107

[8]Hedrich, R., & Neher, E. (2018). Venus flytrap: how an excitable, carnivorous plant works. Trends in Plant Science, 23(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.12.004

[9]Choi, W. G., et al. (2016). Orchestrating rapid long-distance signaling in plants with Ca2+, ROS and electrical signals. The Plant Journal, 90(4), 698-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13492

[10]Kollist, H., et al. (2019). Rapid responses to abiotic stress: priming the landscape for the signal transduction network. Trends in Plant Science, 24(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.003

[11]Mittler, R., et al. (2011). ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends in Plant Science, 16(6), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.007

[12]Eveland, A. L., & Jackson, D. P. (2012). Sugars, signalling, and plant development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(9), 3367-3377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err379

[13]Jaeger, K. E., & Wigge, P. A. (2007). FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 17(12), 1050-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.008

[14]Malamy, J. E., & Ryan, K. S. (2001). Environmental regulation of lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 127(3), 899-909. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010406

[15]Silva-Navas, J., et al. (2016). D-Root: a system to cultivate plants with the root in darkness or under different light conditions. The Plant Journal, 84(1), 244-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12998

[16]Zhu, J. K. (2016). Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles